(720) 457-1457

1615 California St., Suite 206
Denver, CO 80202

Colorado’s Judicial Gold Standard: Merit and Accountability

Archive for the ‘Supreme Court’ Category

Colorado’s Judicial Gold Standard: Merit and Accountability

Thursday, May 10th, 2012

  For ninety years after it achieved statehood in 1876, Colorado elected its judges in partisan elections. As a result, mining and other business interests had so much clout in the courtroom on high profile cases that historian Page Smith lumped the judiciary in with the corrupt executive and legislative branches in labeling Colorado’s state [...]

Colorado upgrades its justice system despite hard fiscal times

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

      – Comedian Mel Brooks is famous for his line: “It’s good to be the king.” But when an irresistible optimism meets an immovable state fiscal crisis, it’s also good to be the Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court. This truth was found to be self-evident when Chief Justice Michael Bender addressed [...]

U.S. Supreme Court reflects nation’s partisan divide

Friday, April 20th, 2012

  The rough reception that Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler received before the U.S. Supreme Court when he argued in behalf of the individual mandate to purchase insurance that is the core of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act surprised many observers. But the sharp divide on the high tribunal came as no shock [...]

Six words that changed the same-sex marriage debate

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

U.S. District Judge Vaugh Walker’s landmark ruling voiding California’s ban on same-sex marriage has not resulted in a resumption of gay nuptials in the Golden State. But the judge’s thoughtful, 136-page decision did evoke six words that may finally shift this rancorous debate away from the issue of gay rights and into the far more [...]

A giant of the law overshadows “Shorty’s” hearing

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Unlike Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and other defenders of the late and unlamented Jim Crow on the Senate Judiciary committee, I come to praise Thurgood Marshall – not to sully him. It is perhaps a tribute to the qualifications of Elena Kagan to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court that diehard foes like Cornyn have [...]

Kagan’s private life: Quisdam dat rattus anus?

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Here at the Mile High Law Office, we have given this matter deep thought and have reached our own conclusion as to the relevance of Kagan’s sexual preferences to her judicial qualifications. To clothe the applicable legal principle in the Latin that befits a high court nomination, we went online to a Latin-to-English translation site and produced this:

Quisnam dat rattus anus?

In plain English, that translates as: “Who gives a rat’s ass?”